○ Cooled down, but questions remained. I reviewed all 200 + works in the main category, although I participated as a judge in it-awards, ru awards and balkan. Very strange results, it seems you haven't watched much of the works. Some of the winner jobs are really weak. Valuation rules, too, apparently not all judges read. How can a video with music win in the Best videographer category?
○ Evaluation guidlines apparently, too, not all judges't read The 'best young specialist" participated in the previous award and previously received awards. How he got into this nomination, is not clear. Many would like to see marks from judges on all works to understand why they have this score, and where do we go from here. There is a suspicion that perhaps someone did not even vote. For me, this competition is losing relevance.
Weva awards 18 results biased?
21 January 2019
Czech Republic, Prague, Táboritská 1000/23, 130 00 Praha 3
·249 views·
Followers
2
Comments:
Hello, I do not quite understand to whom exactly the claim. I also reviewed a lot of works and I can say with a clear conscience that I looked through the works carefully and evaluated as much as possible without prejudice. Unfortunately, in WEVA Award 2018 I evaluated only two new categories, so I can't say anything about the Best videographer category. For their evaluation are responsible, there really was a lot of weak work, which I put 1-2 points, but were strong, bright and in different styles, which I've put 8-10 points. About the recommendations I also had a question, but to remove the video from the category was not in my competence. Sometimes my videos with participation in competitions were removed because of the wrong categories, and here when assessing I often came across such a situation, the video absolutely did not correspond to the category or had nothing to do with the wedding video, but again, I could not remove them. I understand your anger, but such questions probably need to ask the site administration. I am sure they will understand everything and the service will return to its status. For me, WEVA is the only place where there is personal growth.
Более того, я считаю, что ваша позиция раскрывает лишь небольшую часть пороков в организации конкурса.
А как насчет сайта? Является ли “Видео дня” честным? Является ли рейтинг честным? Правила честны? Есть много серьезных проблем, но администраторы сайта и их друзья не заинтересованы говорить о них. Я написал много раз. Посмотрите на тему "Totally unacceptable" на форуме. Я указал на грубые нарушения. Нет результата. К сожалению, коллеги не заинтересованы в этом. Они сосредоточены только на выпуске новых и новых видео. Вот почему ваша позиция еще более ценна.
Поздравляю вас еще раз!
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Виктор Попов
Dear colleagues,
I congratulate you on your honest position on the competition. I congratulate you for the courage to express it. I fully share your disappointment.
Moreover, I believe that your position reveals only a small part of the vices in the organization of the competition.
And what about the site? Is “Video of the day” honest? Is the ranking honest? Are the rules honest? There are many serious problems, but the administrators of the site and their friends have no interest in talking about them. I have written many times. Look at the topic "Totally unacceptable" in the forum. I pointed out drastic violations. No result. Unfortunately, the colleagues are not interested in this. They are only focused on releasing new and new videos.
This is why your position is even more valuable.
I congratulate you once again!
Best regards,
Victor Popov